There is therefore no deduction from the value of the buy-back, in particular the cost equalization agreement nor as bypass business of 196 5 SG is ineffective. Contrary to the opinion of the LG Rostock acquisition and equipment costs are due to a stand-alone KAV regardless of the insurance premiums to pay. There is therefore no uncertainty about the value of the buy-back, especially since this is not diminished by this agreement. The compensation agreement is also not for violation of 305 c BGB or ineffective because of immorality. The cost risk for the defendant in the contract documents that are recognizable and therefore also the risk of costs has been to assess.

In addition, the LG Stendal was that insurance and cost equalization agreement to consider are not as economic and legal unit. An applicability of 8 is thus denying SG & a so-called mixed contract shall not exist. Rather is a legal autonomy of both contracts, which is why a cost equalization agreement remains valid even if the corresponding net policy has been canceled or revoked. The contractor is obliged in this case to the full payment of outstanding rates more judgments on insurance issues comment the lawyers Auer Witte Thiel under. About the law firm Auer Witte Thiel, the specialization areas of focus and the development of core competencies in certain disciplines are indispensable in the legal services sector. Auer Witte Thiel is a business law oriented law firm and represents several German insurance companies. The firm Auer Witte Thiel is Munich.