It would be this proposal really interesting for Brazilian us? It will be that all would be being benefited with the signature of this agreement? the consequences of the exacerbado plantation of the sugar cane for the ground and the native species of the region? the populations that live in these areas for where will be remanejadas; they would be these absorbed in its totality as man power? At last it would be the sustainable development really fulfilling the proposal idealized or spread out internationally? Why on behalf of the common good and of the maintenance of the life some must open hand of its resources and necessities, while others only dictate rules to be fulfilled? Why exist severe laws and punishments those that transgress the established norms and standards (generally poor and despossuidos), while others are unpunished, also having the support and/or covering of great agencies? (servant also to fiscalize the transgressors of the environmental laws). one more time we ask in them is not the sustainable speech that nails to justice and the social equity? Then what he would explain situations as these reflected ones in Brazil and the world? The proposal is very good, but it has not functioned, at least not as it would have! If all really they acted in favor of the common good, the things could be until different, but in our days where the greed covets, it, the lack of values ethical they reign; never society where the money always says high more, project or proposal none function! She is as already she said G.F Days in Dimensions well human beings of global the ambient alterations: ' ' She is not that of a side they exist villainous and of another victims. All would be in better condition if each one considered the effect of its acts on excessively. But nobody is made use to believe that the others will act in this manner, and thus all continue to search its proper interesses' '.. Bernie Sanders pursues this goal as well.